Comparative Study of AI Coding Agents Focusing on Cline

1. Introduction: The Rise of AI Coding Agents and the Focus on Cline

The landscape of software development is undergoing a significant transformation with the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various stages of the development lifecycle. AI coding agents are emerging as powerful tools that automate repetitive tasks, enhance developer productivity, and contribute to improved code quality ¹. These intelligent assistants offer real-time code suggestions, generate code snippets, and even tackle complex refactoring tasks, indicating a fundamental shift in how software is conceived and created ². This trend suggests a future where AI plays an even more integral role in the daily workflows of developers, potentially leading to greater efficiency and fostering innovation by allowing developers to concentrate on higher-level problem-solving.

Among the growing number of AI coding assistants, Cline has garnered considerable attention within the developer community as a potent tool ⁵. This agent leverages advanced language models, notably Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet, to provide intelligent coding assistance ⁵. The buzz surrounding Cline and its reliance on sophisticated AI models indicate that it is not merely a supplementary tool but a potentially transformative force in the realm of AI-assisted coding. Its emergence necessitates a thorough examination of its capabilities and how it distinguishes itself from other prominent agents in the market.

Given the expanding array of AI coding agents now available, a comparative study is essential for developers and organizations seeking to make well-informed decisions regarding their adoption ². Understanding the specific advantages and disadvantages of each agent, particularly in relation to Cline, is crucial for selecting the tool that best aligns with individual or team needs. The sheer volume of options underscores the importance of a structured comparison to guide users through the available choices and help them identify the most suitable agent for their unique requirements.

This report aims to address this need by providing a detailed comparison of leading AI coding agents, with a specific emphasis on Cline. The objectives of this study are to: identify prominent AI coding agents currently available; define and understand the specific meaning and significance of “cline”; compare the core functionalities and features of these agents, focusing on code generation, debugging, and IDE integration; analyze aspects related to Cline, such as its approach to code suggestion, error handling, and learning capabilities; review existing comparative studies and user experiences involving Cline; and summarize the key differences and similarities between the agents, highlighting their approaches relevant to Cline.

2. Understanding Cline: Defining the Agent and Its Significance

Cline is an autonomous coding agent that operates as an extension within the Visual Studio Code (VS Code) integrated development environment ⁶. Its autonomous nature signifies a capability beyond simple code completion, suggesting it can independently perform various development-related tasks with less direct human guidance. This level of agency has the potential to significantly enhance developer productivity by automating more intricate steps in the development process.

Key features and functionalities of Cline highlight its comprehensive approach to AI-assisted development. It acts as a collaborative AI partner, actively participating in the development process by helping to formulate plans, explaining its reasoning behind actions, and soliciting input from the user ⁹. Beyond mere code generation, Cline monitors the entire development environment, including terminals, files, and error logs, and integrates with Model Context Protocol (MCP) Servers to access external resources. It also proactively detects and resolves issues, aiming for a smoother workflow ⁹. Security and privacy are prioritized through enterprise-level features ⁹. Cline supports a wide range of API providers, including OpenRouter, Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, and Azure, offering flexibility in the choice of underlying AI models ⁶. To ensure safe and controlled development, Cline provides a checkpoint system that allows users to review every change made and easily revert to previous states if necessary ⁶.

The significance of Cline in the AI coding landscape is underscored by positive feedback from developers. It has been lauded for its ability to effectively manage entire code repositories ⁹ and has been described as a “game changer” by some users, fundamentally altering their development practices ⁹. Reports of significant productivity gains further emphasize its value proposition ¹⁰. These endorsements suggest that Cline is not just a marginal improvement but a tool that can substantially impact how developers work, offering a compelling reason to examine its capabilities in detail.

3. Overview of Leading AI Coding Agents: A Comparative Landscape

The market for AI coding agents is characterized by a diverse range of tools, each with its unique strengths and focus. Prominent examples include GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer (also known as Amazon Q Developer), Tabnine, Replit AI Agent (also referred to as Ghostwriter), Devin (Cognition AI), Cursor, Windsurf, Bolt, Lovable, v0, AskCodi, Codeium, SWE-Agent (Princeton University), ChatDev, IBM SWE-Agent Suite, Mutable.ai, DeepCode/Snyk Code, AlphaCode (Google DeepMind), Qodo, CodeT5, OpenAI Codex, Sourcegraph Cody, Figstack, IntelliCode, CodeGeeX, Magic Patterns, Uizard AI, Warp, Galileo AI, Aider, GPT-4o, Project Astra, Auto-GPT, Superagent, Do Anything Machine, AgentGPT, BabyAGI, Agent API (MultiOn AI), Aomni, ChemCrow, MetaGPT, Tusk, Cal AI, Cognosys, Meta Code Llama, and PearAI (which integrates Cline) ¹. This extensive list highlights a dynamic and competitive market with various approaches and specializations in AI-assisted coding. The sheer number of available agents suggests that different tools may be better suited for specific development tasks, workflows, or user preferences.

These AI coding agents can be broadly categorized based on their primary functionalities and focus. Some agents, like GitHub Copilot, Tabnine, Codeium, and Replit Ghostwriter, are primarily focused on code completion and suggestion ¹. Others, such as Devin, Cline, SWE-Agent, Auto-GPT, and BabyAGI, aim to be more autonomous agents capable of handling complex tasks with minimal direct supervision ¹. IDE-integrated assistants like Cursor, Windsurf, and Sourcegraph Cody offer AI capabilities directly within the development environment ². Cloud-based assistants, such as Amazon CodeWhisperer/Q Developer and Replit AI Agent, leverage cloud resources for their operations ⁴. Certain agents have more specialized focuses, such as UI/UX development (Uizard AI, v0) or providing specific assistance with testing and documentation (various agents within Tabnine’s suite) ¹. Platforms like PearAI adopt an integrative approach by incorporating multiple AI tools, including Cline, into a single development environment ¹³. This categorization helps to understand the diverse nature of AI coding agents and their intended applications.

Among these, several agents stand out as key competitors. GitHub Copilot, developed by GitHub and OpenAI, is widely recognized for its advanced code completion and problem-solving capabilities, boasting a user base of over 1.5 million developers ¹. Amazon CodeWhisperer (now evolving into Amazon Q Developer) focuses on generating secure and efficient code, particularly for developers working within the AWS ecosystem, and includes features for security scanning ⁴. Tabnine emphasizes user privacy and offers highly personalized code completion, supporting a wide range of programming languages and IDEs, with the option to train bespoke models on private codebases ⁴. Devin, from Cognition AI, is positioned as the world’s first AI software engineer, designed to handle intricate development tasks through multi-agent parallel workflows ¹. Cursor is highly regarded as an overall top AI coding agent, especially for advanced users tackling large and complex projects, known for its deep contextual understanding and real-time collaboration features ². Understanding the core strengths and target users of these leading competitors provides a crucial backdrop for evaluating Cline’s position and unique contributions to the field.

4. Core Functionalities and Features: Code Generation, Debugging, and IDE Integration Across Different Agents

The primary function of most AI coding agents is to assist with code generation, with capabilities ranging from basic code completion to suggesting entire functions or even complex logic ⁴. Agents like GitHub Copilot and Tabnine are adept at suggesting complete functions and code blocks based on the context of the code being written ⁴. However, tools like Devin and Cline aim for a higher level of autonomy in code generation, with the ability to handle more intricate tasks and potentially generate entire features with less direct human intervention ⁴. Amazon Q Developer also offers real-time code suggestions and can even aid in bootstrapping new projects, indicating a move towards more comprehensive code generation capabilities. The varying degrees of code generation autonomy reflect the different levels of AI assistance available, which can significantly impact a developer’s workflow and productivity.

Beyond code generation, many AI agents are incorporating features to assist with debugging. GitHub Copilot, for instance, offers debugging assistance directly within the editor. Amazon Q Developer can scan code for vulnerabilities and suggest immediate fixes, enhancing code security. Cline actively monitors for linter and compiler errors and can proactively resolve issues such as missing imports and syntax errors ⁶. Tabnine has been recognized for its effectiveness in code debugging scenarios ¹⁸. Devin takes a more proactive approach by testing the code it writes and autonomously fixing errors until the code functions correctly ¹⁵. The increasing inclusion of debugging features in AI coding agents demonstrates a trend towards providing more holistic support to developers throughout the coding process, not just during code creation.

Seamless integration with development environments (IDEs) is a critical aspect of AI coding agents, ensuring that developers can access AI assistance without disrupting their established workflows ⁴. Most of the leading agents offer integrations with popular IDEs such as VS Code, JetBrains products, and cloud-based development environments ⁴. Cline is specifically designed as a VS Code extension ⁸. Replit Ghostwriter is unique in that it is integrated directly into the Replit browser-based IDE ⁴. Amazon Q Developer offers broad integration across various IDEs, the AWS Management Console, and collaboration platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack. Cursor stands out as an AI-powered code editor itself, providing a familiar interface while natively incorporating AI functionalities and supporting existing extensions. The emphasis on IDE integration underscores the importance of making AI assistance readily accessible within the tools developers already use.

To provide a clearer comparison of the core features of these leading AI coding agents, the following table summarizes their key functionalities:

Table 1: Feature Comparison of Leading AI Coding Agents

Feature	GitHub Copilot	Amazon Q Developer (CodeWhisperer)	Tabnine	Replit AI Agent (Ghostwriter)	Devin (Cognition AI)	Cursor	Cline
Code Generation	Advanced completion, function suggestions	Real-time suggestions, bootstrapping	Completion, function suggestions, bespoke models	Automatic app/website building from prompts/images	Autonomous code generation, complex tasks, multi-file editing	Tab completion, natural language editing	Autonomous code generation, complex logic, file editing, command execution
Debugging Assistance	Yes	Vulnerability scanning, remediation	Ranked highly for debugging	Yes	Tests own code, fixes errors	Yes	Monitors linter/compiler errors, proactive fixes, terminal command monitoring
IDE Integration	VS Code, JetBrains, others	VS Code, JetBrains, AWS Console, others	VS Code, JetBrains, others	Replit IDE	VS Code interface	VS Code	VS Code
Supported Languages	Multiple	Multiple	Multiple	Multiple	Multiple	Multiple	Multiple
Pricing Model	Free (limited), Subscription	Free (limited), Professional	Free (limited), Pro, Enterprise	Free (limited), Paid	Early access, waitlist	Free (limited), Paid	Pay-per-token (via API keys)
Key Differentiators	Large user base, GitHub integration, chat	AWS integration, security focus	Privacy focus, personalized models, specialized agents	Ease of use, rapid prototyping	First AI software engineer, autonomous, full development lifecycle support	Deep contextual understanding, real-time collaboration, multi-file editing	Autonomous agent, flexible model selection, MCP Server extensibility

This table provides a snapshot of the key features and capabilities of some of the leading AI coding agents, highlighting the diverse approaches and specializations within this rapidly evolving field.

5. In-Depth Analysis of Cline-Related Aspects: Examining Code Suggestion, Error Handling, and Learning Capabilities

Cline’s approach to code suggestion is characterized by its utilization of powerful underlying models such as Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which enables intelligent and context-aware coding assistance ⁵. It moves beyond simple keyword completion, aiming to understand the broader context of the code being written and suggesting not just single lines but entire functions or complex logical structures ⁴. By analyzing the file structure and existing source code, Cline can provide relevant and valuable assistance even within large and intricate projects ⁶. Furthermore, it offers context-aware suggestions that adapt to the user’s specific coding style and established patterns ¹⁸. This focus on understanding context and providing comprehensive suggestions suggests that Cline aims to reduce the amount of manual coding required and improve the overall efficiency of the development process.

In terms of error handling and debugging, Cline incorporates several key features. It actively monitors for errors reported by linters and compilers and can proactively address common issues like missing import statements and syntax errors ⁶. Cline also has the capability to execute terminal commands and observe their output, allowing it to respond dynamically to problems such as errors in a development server ⁶. The inclusion of a “Fix with Cline” code action further streamlines the process of resolving issues, providing developers with a quick way to leverage AI assistance for debugging. This integration of debugging directly into Cline’s workflow allows it to not only aid in writing code but also in identifying and resolving problems autonomously, potentially saving significant time and effort during the debugging phase.

Cline exhibits notable learning capabilities and offers several avenues for customization. Users can define custom instructions within the Cline settings to enforce specific coding standards, establish quality requirements, specify preferences for error handling, and outline documentation practices ⁸. Additionally, Cline supports project-specific instructions through the use of .clinerules files located in the project’s root directory ⁸. This allows for fine-tuning Cline’s behavior based on the unique guidelines of each project. A significant aspect of Cline’s extensibility is its integration with MCP servers, which enables it to connect to external web services, control web browsers, access databases, and automate a wider range of tasks ⁶. Furthermore, Cline integrates with Mem0, a self-improving memory layer, which enhances the personalization of the coding experience by allowing the AI to learn from past interactions and codebase specifics ¹³. These customization and learning features suggest that Cline is designed to be an adaptable and continuously improving AI assistant that can be tailored to meet the specific needs and preferences of individual developers and teams.

6. Comparative Analysis of Cline: Features, Functionalities, Strengths, and Weaknesses Compared to Competitors

When comparing Cline to GitHub Copilot, a key distinction lies in their approaches to AI assistance. Cline is designed as an autonomous coding agent with the capability to handle complex tasks beyond simple code completion, which is a primary strength of Copilot ⁶. While Copilot boasts a larger user base and benefits from strong community support ⁴, Cline offers greater flexibility in terms of the AI models it can utilize through its integration with OpenRouter ⁵. GitHub Copilot provides additional features like chat functionality, web search capabilities, and tight integration with the GitHub ecosystem. This suggests that developers seeking more hands-off, autonomous AI assistance might find Cline more appealing, whereas those who prioritize real-time code completion and seamless integration with GitHub’s platform may prefer Copilot.

In comparison to Amazon CodeWhisperer (and its evolution into Amazon Q Developer), the primary difference lies in their ecosystem focus. CodeWhisperer/Q Developer is deeply integrated with AWS services and places a strong emphasis on security scanning ⁴. Cline, on the other hand, offers broader AI model support through OpenRouter and focuses on more general-purpose autonomous coding tasks ⁵. However, Amazon Q Developer is also developing autonomous agent capabilities, which could lead to an overlap in their functionalities. The choice between these agents might depend on whether the developer primarily works within the AWS environment (making CodeWhisperer/Q Developer a potentially better fit) or requires greater autonomy and flexibility in AI model selection (where Cline might be more advantageous).

Comparing Cline with Tabnine reveals different priorities. Tabnine emphasizes user privacy and the ability to train personalized AI models on a user’s private codebase ⁴. Cline’s focus is more on autonomous task completion and providing broader support for various AI models ⁵. Tabnine also offers a suite of specialized AI agents for tasks such as documentation, code review, and testing ¹⁸. This suggests that developers who prioritize the privacy of their code and desire highly personalized code suggestions might favor Tabnine, while those who need autonomous task execution and flexibility in choosing AI models might find Cline more suitable.

When considering Cursor, which is recognized as a top-tier AI coding agent with strong contextual understanding ², some users have found value in using Cline in conjunction with Cursor ²⁵. Cursor offers features like multi-file smart editing and real-time collaboration ², while Cline is particularly praised for its effectiveness in handling complex code refactoring tasks ²⁵. This suggests a potential complementary relationship between the two tools, where Cursor provides a robust editing environment and Cline offers advanced autonomous capabilities for more complex operations.

Cline’s strengths include its autonomous coding agent capabilities, allowing it to handle intricate development tasks with less direct supervision ⁶. Its flexibility in supporting a wide range of AI models through OpenRouter provides users with more options ⁵. Cline also offers strong collaboration features and aims to streamline the entire development workflow ⁹. The extensibility provided by MCP Servers allows for further customization and integration with external resources ⁶. Additionally, user reports indicate that Cline is particularly effective for complex code refactoring tasks ²⁵.

However, Cline also has weaknesses. Its token-based pricing model, where users pay for the amount of processing used, can become expensive for developers who use it heavily ⁵. Some users have reported performance issues when working with very large code files ⁵, and there have been instances of difficulties with the file writing process ¹⁰. Compared to some competitors that offer flat-rate subscription models, Cline’s cost can be unpredictable and potentially higher ⁵.

7. Existing Comparative Studies and Reviews: Insights from Third-Party Evaluations

A comparison between Cline and GoCodeo highlights differences in their pricing models and performance ⁵. GoCodeo offers a fixed monthly subscription, which can provide more predictable costs compared to Cline’s pay-per-token approach, especially for frequent users. GoCodeo is also reported to handle larger code files more consistently than Cline. However, Cline offers a wider selection of AI models through its integration with OpenRouter, providing greater flexibility. This comparison underscores the trade-offs between cost predictability, performance with large codebases, and the flexibility of choosing AI models.

User experiences shared on platforms like Reddit provide valuable insights into the practical application of Cline ¹⁰. Some users have lauded Cline as an indispensable tool that significantly enhances their coding efficiency ¹⁰. Others have reported challenges with file writing and expressed concerns about the potentially high costs associated with its token-based pricing ¹⁰. One user, in comparing Cline with Cursor, found Cline to be superior for complex refactoring tasks despite the higher potential cost ²⁵. The cost-effectiveness of a past $20/month plan for Cline was also noted in relation to its potential token consumption ²⁶. Interestingly, some users have found a beneficial workflow by using Cline within the Cursor editor, suggesting that these tools might complement each other’s strengths ²⁵. These varied user experiences emphasize that the suitability of Cline can depend on individual needs, project characteristics, and tolerance for its specific cost model and potential limitations.

Comparisons on platforms like Slashdot between Cline and other AI coding tools like RA.Aid and Double.bot (which appear to refer to Sourcegraph Cody and Codeium, respectively) focus on the broader ecosystem integrations offered by these competitors ¹⁶. Tools like Sourcegraph Cody and Codeium emphasize integration with various development tools and platforms, extending their contextual understanding beyond just the code itself. While Cline’s direct performance against these specific tools is not detailed, the emphasis on a wider range of integrations is a noteworthy point for consideration when evaluating Cline’s overall capabilities and competitiveness.

8. Strengths and Weaknesses of AI Coding Agents in Relation to Cline

Competitors of Cline exhibit several strengths that differentiate them. Some offer more cost-effective solutions through flat-rate pricing models, which can be advantageous for developers with high usage needs ⁵. Certain agents are reported to handle very large codebases with greater reliability and consistency ⁵. A number of competitors provide broader integration with a wider array of development tools and platforms, enhancing their utility within diverse development ecosystems ¹⁶. Some agents, like Tabnine, offer specialized features tailored for specific tasks such as code review and documentation ¹⁸. GitHub Copilot benefits from a large and active user community, providing extensive resources and support ⁴. Additionally, agents like Tabnine prioritize user privacy with options for private model deployment ⁴.

Conversely, competitors may also have weaknesses compared to Cline. Many primarily focus on code completion and suggestions, lacking the level of autonomous task execution that Cline offers ⁶. Some agents may be limited in their choice of underlying AI models, whereas Cline provides greater flexibility through OpenRouter ⁵. Cline emphasizes collaboration and aims to provide comprehensive context throughout the development process, which might be less pronounced in some other tools ⁹. Furthermore, Cline’s MCP Server integration offers a unique level of extensibility that may not be available in all competing agents ⁶.

Overall, Cline distinguishes itself through its emphasis on autonomous coding capabilities and its flexible support for various AI models. However, potential users should carefully consider its token-based pricing model and reported performance limitations when dealing with very large code files. Ultimately, the most suitable AI coding agent will depend on the specific requirements, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the individual developer or development team.

9. Conclusion: Key Differences, Similarities, and Recommendations

The analysis reveals several key differences among leading AI coding agents. Cline and Devin stand out for their higher levels of autonomy, capable of handling more complex development tasks compared to agents like GitHub Copilot and Tabnine, which are primarily focused on code completion and suggestion ⁶. Pricing models vary significantly, with Cline employing a pay-per-token approach, while others offer flat-rate subscriptions or free tiers ⁵. Cline provides greater flexibility in the choice of underlying AI models through its OpenRouter integration ⁵. Some agents, like Sourcegraph Cody and Codeium, boast broader integrations with various development tools and platforms ¹⁶. For developers with stringent privacy needs, Tabnine offers strong privacy guarantees and the option for private model deployment ⁴.

Despite these differences, there are also key similarities. All prominent AI coding agents aim to enhance developer productivity and improve the quality of code ¹. Most integrate seamlessly with popular IDEs to provide readily accessible assistance ⁴. They all leverage advanced machine learning models to understand and generate code based on context and user input.

Based on this comparative study, several recommendations can be made. For developers seeking a highly autonomous AI coding agent with the flexibility to choose from various AI models, Cline presents a compelling option. However, it is crucial to be aware of the potential costs associated with its token-based pricing model and to consider the size of the codebases they typically work with. Teams that prioritize predictable costs and require reliable performance with very large projects might find flat-rate subscription models offered by alternatives more suitable. Developers with strict data privacy requirements should explore agents like Tabnine that offer private model deployment options. The strategy of leveraging the strengths of multiple tools, such as using Cline within Cursor as reported by some users, could also be a valuable approach to maximize productivity by combining the benefits of different agents. It is advisable for developers and organizations to conduct further research and potentially undertake trial periods with different AI coding agents to determine the best fit for their specific needs and workflows.

Looking towards the future, the field of AI coding agents is expected to continue its rapid evolution, with frequent introductions of new features and underlying AI models. Future developments may include even more sophisticated autonomous capabilities, improved performance when handling large and complex codebases, deeper integration with debugging tools, and more adaptable pricing models. A likely trend is the increasing integration of AI agents into all stages of the software development lifecycle, from the initial planning and design phases through to deployment and maintenance.

引用文献

1. Top AI Coding Agents in 2025 – MarkTechPost, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.marktechpost.com/2025/02/03/top-ai-coding-agents-in-2025/
2. Which AI Agent is Best for Coding in 2025? | by Types Digital | T3CH – Medium, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://medium.com/h7w/which-ai-agent-is-best-for-coding-in-2025-6c45c6e487ab
3. Best AI for Coding in 2025: 25 Developer Tools to Use (or Avoid) – Pragmatic Coders, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.pragmaticcoders.com/resources/ai-developer-tools
4. Top AI Agents for Software Development 2025 – Prismetric, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.prismetric.com/top-ai-agents-for-software-development/
5. GoCodeo vs. Cline: A Detailed Analysis, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.gocodeo.com/post/gocodeo-vs-cline-a-detailed-analysis
6. cline/cline: Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE … – GitHub, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://github.com/cline/cline
7. Best AI Code Editors in 2025 – Builder.io, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.builder.io/blog/best-ai-code-editors
8. AI Autonomous Coding Agent for VS Code – Cline, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://cline.bot/faq
9. Cline – AI Autonomous Coding Agent for VS Code, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://cline.bot/
10. Claude, Cursor, Aider, Cline, or GitHub Copilot—Which is the Best AI Coding Assistant? : r/ClaudeAI – Reddit, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1izmyps/claude_cursor_aider_cline_or_github_copilotwhich/
11. 15 Best AI Coding Assistant Tools in 2025 – Qodo, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.qodo.ai/blog/best-ai-coding-assistant-tools/
12. List of the 15 Best AI Agents In 2024, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://explodingtopics.com/blog/ai-agents
13. PearAI – The AI Code Editor For Your Next Project, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://trypear.ai/
14. The best AI for coding in 2025 (and what not to use – including DeepSeek R1) – ZDNET, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.zdnet.com/article/the-best-ai-for-coding-in-2025-and-what-not-to-use-including-deepseek-r1/
15. Introducing Devin, the first AI software engineer – Cognition AI, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://cognition.ai/blog/introducing-devin
16. Compare Cline vs. RA.Aid in 2025 – Slashdot, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://slashdot.org/software/comparison/Cline-AI-vs-RA.Aid/
17. Compare Cline vs. Double in 2025 – Slashdot, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://slashdot.org/software/comparison/Cline-AI-vs-Double.bot/
18. AI Coding Assistant – Tabnine, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.tabnine.com/ai-code-assistant/
19. Tabnine AI Code Assistant | private, personalized, protected, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.tabnine.com/
20. Tabnine: AI Coding Assistant for Faster and Safer Development – Deepgram, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://deepgram.com/ai-apps/tabnine
21. Devin review: is it a better AI coding agent than Cursor? – Builder.io, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.builder.io/blog/devin-vs-cursor
22. Devin AI, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://devin.ai/
23. Devin Docs: Introducing Devin, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://docs.devin.ai/get-started/devin-intro
24. Meet Devin: The AI Coding Agent – DEV Community, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://dev.to/arbisoftcompany/meet-devin-the-ai-coding-agent-3997
25. My experience with Cursor vs Cline after 3 months of daily use : r/ChatGPTCoding – Reddit, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1inyt2s/my_experience_with_cursor_vs_cline_after_3_months/
26. Cline (autonomous coding agent) just deployed a massive release with plan/act persistence, a context window progress bar, and many more features. If you’re non-technical and want to start writing code, Cline is perfect for you! : r/ClaudeAI – Reddit, 3月 28, 2025にアクセス、 https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1idbit9/cline_autonomous_coding_agent_just_deployed_a/

Like